Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:42:04 +0900 (JST) From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ahze@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/faac/files patch-gcc Message-ID: <200410301542.i9UFg4pH019425@sakura.ninth-nine.com> In-Reply-To: <20041030140559.GB83224@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200410300322.i9U3MNsA017587@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041030211415.3330b88b.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20041030140559.GB83224@toxic.magnesium.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:05:59 -0400 Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > Modified files: > > > audio/faac/files patch-gcc > > > Log: > > > Add missing header to fix build of gstreamer-plugins on >5.x > > Thank you. But, please bump PORTREVISION in this case(for > > effect to other ports, such as a significant change). > >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/faac/files patch-gcc" from Norikatsu Shigemura << > Why? If gst-p wouldn't build before on >5.X, why force 4.X users to > rebuild faac to fix a problem they didn't have? It was on my suggestion > that he didn't bump PORTREVISION, btw. If this fix only for faac-self, I don't say that. Please note, this fix causes that *gst-p* can build on >5.x. In my environment, I already updated faac before this fix. I was in trouble. But I noticed this commit. If I din't update faac *manually*, I couldn't update gst-p. Why not *automatically*? To not rebuild on 4.x users. Humm. Don't worry about trifles. If faac isn't bumped PORTREVISION, update /usr/ports/UPDATING. Or *anyone* can't notice how to fix build error problem on gst-p, *officially*.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410301542.i9UFg4pH019425>