Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 09:46:03 +0200 From: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>, "freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase Message-ID: <CAOc73CCE0j3D05tu_1nnjtYEL8=Jk9nMGeMzjeDKaGgW=71ohQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160507074159.GC47527@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAOc73CC6WoFHPDBa6LGMyhmnA1ZjiemffyTJBGBNSZwPOu8KzA@mail.gmail.com> <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org> <CAOc73CACQUhx2rGuC1ftcpuk=LeOv8fEpnR0A2PPRGVo31RYRg@mail.gmail.com> <7018EDCD-A567-446D-965C-9E886D543238@gmail.com> <20160507074159.GC47527@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that > otherwise violates POLA? The commit recently was intended to revert > a POLA violation, so maybe I am not entirely clear on what branch this > affects. > > Are we talking about head or stable/10 here? > > Glen > I am talking about head, which no longer installs/packages multiple kernels by default. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/Makefile.inc1?revision=299088&view=markup Whilst the r299088 commit is referring to a stable POLA violation, the commit itself is a change to head with a proposed MFC after 3 days. Its interesting, because this has surprised me when testing PkgBase on head, as the behaviour has changed from the initial announcement. Regards, Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOc73CCE0j3D05tu_1nnjtYEL8=Jk9nMGeMzjeDKaGgW=71ohQ>