Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 10:59:08 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: "apache@FreeBSD.org" <apache@FreeBSD.org> Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: apache 2.2 ports Message-ID: <4D3C03D8-2C96-46BD-B97E-590227C8FEF0@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <540C33E6.3040805@gmx.de> References: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org> <540C33E6.3040805@gmx.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 7 Sep, 2014, at 6:31, olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2014-09-06 17:24, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> apache team - >> >> So it seems that setting USE_APACHE=22 doesn’t actually depend on apache-2.2. This means that every USE_APACHE=22 port is broken, and as of right now won’t have any 10.1 packages. >> >> I’m happy to go through and add "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= APACHE=22” to this ports, but I wanted to check with you guys first. Is that the right way to fix it? Is there something else that can be done to make USE_APACHE=22 actually depend on apache-2.2? >> > > Hi Adam, > > could you give the patch below a try? > I've tested the patch with a small selection from USE_APACHE=(22|22+|24) ports and with the patch bsd.default-versions.mk does not overwrite the requirements. That patch works perfectly for me. USE_APACHE=22, 22+, and 24 all do the right thing now. However, it doesn’t check against bad values. USE_APACHE=42 just drops the apache dependency altogether... most other USE_* systems put out an error in that situation. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.orghelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D3C03D8-2C96-46BD-B97E-590227C8FEF0>