Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:01:05 -0500 (EST)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: libfetch kqueue patch
Message-ID:  <200111262001.fAQK15b21599@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3BFCDB3F.F0DD7BA0@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20011121223202.0e85d777.david@phobia.ms> <xzpitc3147r.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3BFCDB3F.F0DD7BA0@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 13:02:23 +0200, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> said:

> For what it's worth, it also makes code less portable.

On the other hand, it would also make libfetch useful in a larger
variety of applications; viz., those which have so many file
descriptors open that the one used by libfetch will overflow the
default fd_set.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111262001.fAQK15b21599>