Date: Sat, 03 May 1997 21:06:23 -0500 From: dkelly@hiwaay.net To: Are Bryne <are@communique.no> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why isn't manpath(1) used? (fwd) Message-ID: <199705040206.VAA18969@nexgen.hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Message from Are Bryne <are@communique.no> of "Sat, 03 May 1997 18:39:09 %2B0200." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970503183649.4740A-100000@rune.communique.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I received no answers on this from -questions, so I try here. > Are Bryne > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Are Bryne <are@communique.no> > Organization: Communique DA > To: questions@freebsd.org > Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 21:24:47 +0200 (CEST) > Subject: Why isn't manpath(1) used? > > Having installed 2.2.1-REL, I ask myself why specifically > /usr/share/skel/dot.login doesn't use manpath(1) instead of setting it > statically. I noticed about the same thing the other day. /etc/weekly also fails to use manpath(1). -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705040206.VAA18969>