Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:27:12 -0400 From: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/cpio Makefile bsdcpio.1 cmdline.c config_freebsd.h cpio.c cpio.h cpio_platform.h err.c matching.c matching.h pathmatch.c pathmatch.h src/usr.bin/cpio/test Makefile main.c test.h test_0.c test_basic.c test_format_newc.c ... Message-ID: <1211981232.1637.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20080528013528.GA97270@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200805261715.m4QHFZUK070554@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080526172717.GA93432@freebsd.org> <483AFE87.6020103@freebsd.org> <20080528013528.GA97270@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 18:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > > I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and our current > > pax implementation from the tree, > > I don't see a reason to remove pax from the tree. It is already BSDL'ed > and is faster than libarchive based archivers. Please take this a > request to not remove pax. > I am reading this as "replace pax with a libarchive-based pax". Correct me if I am wrong, but the couldn't the current pax implementation just be cored and modified to link against libarchive for the archive-handling code? -- Coleman Kane [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkg9XaMACgkQcMSxQcXat5eDEACbB4mDJGoMtPV8iUNal/xAP/sc WzoAn2A6pQTNWrhpZoh1MbJETn957cY0 =o5iX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1211981232.1637.5.camel>