Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 21:21:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r221124 - in head: . sbin/mount sbin/mount_nfs sys/amd64/conf sys/fs/nfsclient sys/i386/conf sys/ia64/conf sys/nfsclient sys/pc98/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sparc64/conf sys/sun4v/conf Message-ID: <1310797810.1031067.1304558503327.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <86mxj7gaa2.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> writes: > > "Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav" <des@des.no> writes: > > > Are you going to rename the sysctls as well? > > I was not planning on it, but it the "collective" thinks it's a good > > idea, I could do so. >=20 > Yes, please. The change from vfs.nfs to vfs.newnfs breaks scripts. >=20 > Ideally, both the old and the new NFS stack would use the same fstypes > and sysctl names, but I don't know if there's any way we can prevent > someone from compiling both into the kernel at the same time, or > loading > both modules. > If the scripts in /etc/rc.d are fixed to use the correct sysctl naming, do you think it matters which one is "vfs.nfs."? rick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1310797810.1031067.1304558503327.JavaMail.root>