Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:40:10 +0900 From: Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp> To: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, nclayton@lehman.com, motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com, kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp, doc@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-translate@ngo.org.uk, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-tech-jp@jp.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation Message-ID: <199906271240.VAA06437@rei.snipe.rim.or.jp> References: <57461.930305624@zippy.cdrom.com> <199906251220.VAA22552@sakura.snipe.rim.or.jp> <19990625150942.K15628@lehman.com> <199906252311.QAA04505@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990626014203.B71532@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi,
Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> * How many distinct languages are catered for in that directory? There's
> no way to tell.
>
> * It's incredibly inconsistent. Look at
>
> en_US.utf/ US English, probably
I think "en" is better. Because English is used in many countries
(U.K., Austraria, New Zealand, etc.).
> ja/ Japanese, but which encoding?
>
> ja.JIS/ JIS encoding, so the previous one is probably EUC
'ja.JIS' is not needed, I think. If both 'ja' and 'ja.JIS' exists,
FreeBSD users will be confused.
# I explained the reason why 'ja' is sufficient in the previous e-mail.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motoyuki Konno mkonno@res.yamanashi-med.ac.jp (Univ)
motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp (Home)
motoyuki@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Project)
Yamanashi Medical University http://www.freebsd.org/~motoyuki/ (WWW)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906271240.VAA06437>