Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 14:51:22 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@msu.edu> To: Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Best remote backup method? Message-ID: <20070516185122.GB50091@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <437646E3279CED649940FB48@utd59514.utdallas.edu> References: <437646E3279CED649940FB48@utd59514.utdallas.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> I'm presently backing up two servers in a remote location to a usb drive
> located elsewhere by using rsync over ssh (all three are FreeBSD boxes.)
> After the recent discussion about dump, I'm wondering if I would gain
> anything by using dump rather than rsync. Has anyone used both? Any
> thoughts as to which is "better" and why?
>
> The rsync command I use is:
> rsync -avz ${LOCALDIR} -e "ssh -i ${KEY}" ${REMOTEHOST}:${REMOTEDIR}
Well, I suppose you could dump to a file and then rsync it to the
other machine...
Basically, I think dump would give you a file over there that
is in dump format and rsync would give you something that
essentially duplicates the file system you are backing up rather
than creating a dump file.
A dump file would be easier to pull back and restore if you had a
major/catastrophic loss of disk and had to replace the disk (or undo
an inappropriate rm -rf *).
Either would be about the same effort restoring a single or handful
of files from backup.
////jerry
>
> --
> Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
> Senior Information Security Analyst
> The University of Texas at Dallas
> http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070516185122.GB50091>