Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 May 2024 09:44:56 -0700
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: git: 61dece6d27fb - main - Enable soft updates by default for UFS2 filesystems.
Message-ID:  <6bc02a7a-e711-426c-835f-0b89d9479569@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <0100018f7ae933d3-815c24d4-8d83-42b1-b354-3c0901b6d6e0-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References:  <202405150540.44F5eEtA013445@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <0100018f7ae933d3-815c24d4-8d83-42b1-b354-3c0901b6d6e0-000000@email.amazonses.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/14/24 11:20 PM, Colin Percival wrote:
> On 5/14/24 22:40, Kirk McKusick wrote:
>> commit 61dece6d27fb2436928ca93d65667b358e05aa7b
>> Author:     Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
>> AuthorDate: 2024-05-15 05:38:35 +0000
>> Commit:     Kirk McKusick <mckusick@FreeBSD.org>
>> CommitDate: 2024-05-15 05:40:01 +0000
>>
>>       Enable soft updates by default for UFS2 filesystems.
>>       [...]
>>       
>>       MFC after:   1 week
> If we're not worried about this being too astonishing a change for a stable
> branch (and I'm not -- I can't imagine too many people being upset that
> they get better performance than they used to), is there any reason to not
> include this in 14.1?

+1 for merging to 14.1

-- 
John Baldwin




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6bc02a7a-e711-426c-835f-0b89d9479569>