Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 14:07:02 -0500 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> Cc: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ld: kernel.debug: Not enough room for program headers Message-ID: <20120204190702.GC37724@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20120204184816.GA52504@icarus.home.lan> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1202041035400.59919@wonkity.com> <20120204184816.GA52504@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:48:16AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:57:40AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > > Trying to build 8-stable i386 for the last couple of days gives this > > error when building the kernel: > > > > /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -c -O -pipe -march=prescott -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -Werror vers.c > > linking kernel.debug > > ld: kernel.debug: Not enough room for program headers (allocated 5, need 6) > > ld: final link failed: Bad value > > *** Error code 1 > > 1 error > > *** Error code 2 > > 1 error > > *** Error code 2 > > 1 error > > The freebsd-stable mailing list has been filled with tinderbox failures > for this exact problem with the LINT kernel, and it appears to be > specific to RELENG_8 on i386. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2012-February/thread.html > > Start from the bottom and search upwards for the string: > "[releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386" > > Point being: the problem is not you. > This is why I don't like ccache. Technically the problem is there but also coexists within the source itself. For whatever reason I would believe a cached copy of already built source is having some collisions. As already stated "NO CCACHE" the kernel can be built with what I posted on three different machines. -- ;s =; [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPLYHVAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+9V0H/jXTOQO8JjIDOe8qJvAbEXKu Im9rdogmcbqQ5TzUcvlCp9DFmIyF/OWrceLau99rCGKEvPYUDI8MgmKk+wTeeZrJ SokuYe1q4PJXqrAX3ktDFfymg5C8MRFefByc722Qkl9G1bQNxoNIDN39VoJZIQsD 5P8kcXeQTUwSuDaZBxYpnuUGx2WJcXgGggu2vUBRAEq+1Zy6Q2217RfFtBWv7Ozs dRf6W56D2/IqF1eud47tJY1W5OLTwz4ljJqyMzLIkgLmZklcGLKVTLFQem3BRLIW 65hepADHpIDxaJ9fM6m9mUZGRhroSp1ksLprwkrPUeET5zKDsxuDY3v/9rY9fgk= =ara/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120204190702.GC37724>