Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:27:49 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r242102 - in head: contrib/bmake usr.bin/bmake Message-ID: <CADLo83_TQ0213jeo16J5X=vdKVbbYPq=WN2HZJCLkKMCP=RkFA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121114184837.GA73505@kib.kiev.ua> References: <201210252318.q9PNI6IQ069461@svn.freebsd.org> <20121114172823.GA20127@dragon.NUXI.org> <20121114184837.GA73505@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14 Nov 2012 18:49, "Konstantin Belousov" <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:28:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:18:06PM +0000, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > > Log: > > > Merge bmake-20121010 > > > > Hi Simon, > > I was kicking the tires on this and noticed bmake is dynamically linked. > > > > Can you change it to being statically linked? > > > > > > This issue most recently came up in freebsd-current. See thread pieces > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033460.html > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033472.html > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2012-April/033473.html > > As you see, I prefer to not introduce new statically linked binaries into base. > If, for unfortunate turns of events, bmake is changed to be statically linked, > please obey WITH_SHARED_TOOLCHAIN. Or a /rescue/bmake for when speed is a concern would also be acceptable. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_TQ0213jeo16J5X=vdKVbbYPq=WN2HZJCLkKMCP=RkFA>