Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 09:42:25 +0200 From: Andrea Campi <andrea@webcom.it> To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2203] Re: 0228 regressions on Thinkpad 570E Message-ID: <20030515074225.GA23529@webcom.it> In-Reply-To: <20030509201530.GC631@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <20030509141805.GA815@webcom.it> <20030509201530.GC631@laptop.6bone.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:15:31PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
> > May 9 16:03:16 brian kernel: acpi_cmbat0: battery initialization failed, giving up
> > May 9 16:03:16 brian kernel: acpi_cmbat1: battery initialization failed, giving up
> >
> > where before the last import, I only got the message about acpi_cmbat1 (which albeit
> > not correct is ok, since the battery is not there).
>
> I've traced this to the BIF_ object. I'm trying to trace down where the
> length of 0 is introduced.
I'm not sure what you're referring to; I've read your other messages and it seems to me
that the issue I'm seeing is completely unrelated to the one you're seeing. I've never
had a message about 0 length buffers; in fact, the only similarity I can see is that
both appeared after the latest import, and that's all.
Regardless, this bug is not very interesting; the other one I mentioned (temperature
evalutating to 65535 (= (short)-1) is worse.
Bye,
Andrea
--
Intel: where Quality is job number 0.9998782345!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030515074225.GA23529>