Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:10:38 -0600 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: Josef Karthauser <joe@tao.org.uk>, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -14% available on /tmp Message-ID: <20071206221038.GA70675@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20071206215352.GA986@in-addr.com> References: <20071206210848.GA63825@transwarp.tao.org.uk> <20071206215352.GA986@in-addr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:53:52PM -0500, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:08:48PM +0000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > One of my servers is reporting: > >=20 > > # df | grep tmp > > /dev/mirror/boot0e 507630 -64328 531348 -14% /tmp > >=20 > > How weird is that? I wonder what is going on. > > The kernel is dated: > >=20 > > 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #68: Mon Oct 2 14:36:13 BST 2006 >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DISK-MORE= -THAN-FULL >=20 > Not sure why its -14% rather than the more normal -8%, but I suspect thats > whats happened. I've also seen the occasional corrupted fs where the counts were seriously = out of whack. A fsck (or since it's just /tmp a newfs might be in order. -- Brooks --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHWHNdXY6L6fI4GtQRAi67AJ0ZKpil+01oxGJScEujXafmUNRmswCfexDE 2EIgi5Imo6xxpNpyyWdNyp8= =fKBU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071206221038.GA70675>