Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:41:57 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabextract Makefile ports/archivers/dact Makefile ports/archivers/star Makefile ports/archivers/arj Makefile ports/archivers/tardy ... Message-ID: <20050412024157.GA48655@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050411184433.GA69339@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200504110804.j3B84fNs060515@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050411084210.GA2339@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050411180839.GA32740@dragon.NUXI.org> <1113243303.934.14.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <20050411182133.GA62598@xor.obsecurity.org> <1113244611.934.19.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <20050411184433.GA69339@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:44:33AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > The first issue here is timing. As reminded in my original email > there are not supposed to be any sweeping commits during the ports > slush. The second issue is the amount of breakage that happened here > due to untested changes and apparent lack of visual review of the diff > prior to committing. I did review the diff, but it was 13769 lines, and affected 778 ports. I goofed on a few ports, and am quite embarred by that. But the goofs only 1% of the commit. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050412024157.GA48655>