Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 21:09:27 -0500 (EST) From: jim <jim@jwweeks.com> To: "Alastair D'Silva" <deece@newmillennium.net.au> Cc: "'Simon'" <simon@optinet.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Questions about Apache Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203222103300.396-100000@veager.jwweeks.com> In-Reply-To: <002801c1d20c$42b9d500$3200a8c0@riker>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Alastair D'Silva wrote: > The port by default runs as nobody/nogroup, but I prefer to make to make > a www:www user/group for it, since it is bad practice to have files > owned by nobody. I might be missing something here, but I can't see a lot of difference. Both users nobody, and www are un-privileged users. Other than uids being either bellow 100 of above. What difference could it possibly make? I still think removing the pass phrase and chmoding the file 600 is probably the safest thing to do, other than allays being around for a reboot. -- Jim Weeks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0203222103300.396-100000>