Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 14:04:40 +0200 From: jeremie le-hen <le-hen_j@epita.fr> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: altq in main tree? Message-ID: <20040422120440.GA29038@rocco.epita.fr> In-Reply-To: <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net> References: <20040421114802.GA4820@profi.kharkov.ua> <200404211456.34624.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I just wonder if there are any chances that altq will be in the main
> > tree in the near future?
>
> I work on altq integration on and off for a couple of weeks, yet the outcome
> is unclear as the required locking for altq is not exactly easy to do. But as
> vital locking is a must-do item for any new subsystem these days, we will
> have to see how it works out.
I must havemissed something. I though that ALTQ was already in the tree
since it is supposed to be fully integrated in pf.
--
Jeremie LE HEN aka TtZ/TataZ jeremie.le-hen@epita.fr
ttz@epita.fr
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040422120440.GA29038>