Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 10:23:26 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Patrick Dung <patrick_dkt@yahoo.com.hk>, freebsd hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About QUOTA support in stock kernel (resent) Message-ID: <CAF6rxgk=RUYv_Fi5dk1%2BG7D9e4UdQY%2BUVj5hYjE_TD3ToSHsjw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121225150712.GA82219@kib.kiev.ua> References: <1356111338.1283.YahooMailClassic@web190806.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1356442470.26290.YahooMailClassic@web190804.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <20121225150712.GA82219@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 December 2012 10:07, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > Enabling quota by default would cause small overhead, like one mutex acquire, > for each inode and block alloc/dealloc, even for mount without quotas enabled. Why is this, and can it be avoided (for mounts without quotas)? > Might be, it is reasonable to just enable it now. Unless somebody provide > valid objections and I do not forget, I will do it in a week for HEAD. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgk=RUYv_Fi5dk1%2BG7D9e4UdQY%2BUVj5hYjE_TD3ToSHsjw>