Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:53:38 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest Message-ID: <20040324195338.GC8779@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403231610210.49185-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403231616280.23950-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403231610210.49185-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:36:35PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > TLS is "kernel invisible" (other than what we have already done to make > %gs point where we need it.) ((or the equivalent in other > architectures) > so there is no kernel work.. Uh, who is going to investigate the situation on the other platforms and make any needed changes? Lack of that is also a deal breaker. I won't participate in TLS if it is going to be yet another feature that makes our platforms not on equal footing.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040324195338.GC8779>