Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:35:35 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Failed attempt to boot a (non-debug) head -r339076 on an old PowerMac G5 "Quad Core" (built via devel/powerpc64-gcc): Waking up CPU 1 Message-ID: <C6D71821-60D9-41E4-810B-008CDA772A80@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <C0FD8A95-A3DA-45FA-A59E-C7308EA95DFF@yahoo.com> References: <0E6DB192-37A3-45EC-87E9-C5AA1C9397AE@yahoo.com> <785D268A-2612-459F-BD1F-A650D9ECCA28@fh-muenster.de> <A62CE721-B12A-4A79-BC43-F4E0F412D695@yahoo.com> <A7E94F86-E160-4E58-8C44-99DE109D2758@fh-muenster.de> <3DCB6910-6F08-408A-B3D1-70A7EB5A55BC@yahoo.com> <037e3dd6-cc0c-a39f-f074-bce01887156c@blastwave.org> <20181008152746.1aba4221@ralga.knownspace> <AF5D435D-727A-4C8B-8E9C-749CDB1E2140@yahoo.com> <031407DB-57AD-4E09-9A22-A0D4A347576E@yahoo.com> <C0FD8A95-A3DA-45FA-A59E-C7308EA95DFF@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Reverting head -r334498 in my head -r339076 context was enough to get the G5 so-called "Quad Core" to boot just fine as a variant of -r339076 .] On 2018-Oct-9, at 12:54 PM, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: > On 2018-Oct-9, at 8:20 AM, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: >=20 >> [The stable/head mix seems to be a wrong idea: 11.2 gets past >> the SMP: messages just fine on the so-called G5 "Quad Core".] >>=20 >> On 2018-Oct-8, at 5:14 PM, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: >>=20 >>> On 2018-Oct-8, at 1:27 PM, Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf at gmail.com> = wrote: >>>=20 >>>>> . . . >>>>=20 >>>> It would be helpful to know the last known-good SVN revision, both = for >>>> Head and 11.x, as well as the oldest failing one. Since my G5 bit = the >>>> dust, I can't check locally. >>>=20 >> . . . >=20 > There are examples of head's kernels that sometimes > fail to get to the "SMP:" messages and sometimes work > for getting there (and beyond). So: >=20 > My reporting any example failure is a solid indicator > of the "does not reach "SMP:" problem in that build. > (All tries reached the waking message on at least cpu > 1.) >=20 > My reporting "worked" for a revision might be a > misclassification. (This makes for a messier > "binary-like search".) >=20 > That said, the summary of the later detail is: >=20 > head -r334494 kernel worked > head -r334528 kernel failed >=20 > (There is nothing between those for: >=20 > = https://artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/head/r*/powerpc/powerpc64/kernel.= txz >=20 > so getting a smaller range requires builds. > I've not attempted that.) >=20 > The only machine-dependent powerpc64 change between > those 2 that I see is: >=20 > Author: jhibbits > Date: Fri Jun 1 21:37:20 2018 > New Revision: 334498 > URL:=20 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/334498 >=20 >=20 > Log: > Increase powerpc64 KVA from ~7.25GB to 32GB > . . . >=20 > . . . In my -r339076 build context I reverted -r334498, did a buildkernel, installed it, and rebooted into -r339076. The result booted just fine. It does appear that, for head, -r334498 makes the difference for some reason. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C6D71821-60D9-41E4-810B-008CDA772A80>