Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 01:46:32 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: procfs patch Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970812014216.8334B-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199708111911.MAA23776@kithrup.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Aug 1997, Sean Eric Fagan wrote: > Consider this: > > you run suid program > it does some stuff, then sesetuid's to you > it then exec's a program, as you > > You can make that last program core dump. Got it? It can core dump. It > can core dump. It can core dump. At this point you just not make clear enough in your previous postings that _exec_ happens between setuid and core dump, it cause Marc's and my confusion. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@null.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970812014216.8334B-100000>