Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 13:32:28 +0400 From: "Andrew P." <infofarmer@gmail.com> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again Message-ID: <cb520642050727023248e54189@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200507261720.11329.ringworm01@gmail.com> References: <cb52064205072616005af207a8@mail.gmail.com> <200507261631.45751.ringworm01@gmail.com> <cb5206420507261648e8ba3d8@mail.gmail.com> <200507261720.11329.ringworm01@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <ringworm01@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:48, Andrew P. wrote: > > On 7/27/05, Michael C. Shultz <ringworm01@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 26 July 2005 16:00, Andrew P. wrote: > > > > Hello all! > > > > > > > > I remember being able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between two Win95 > > > > workstations with NE2000 $10 NIC's installed, connected via BNC cab= le. > > > > I am now able to reach 11-12Mbytes/s between all kinds of Windows > > > > 2000/XP machines with all kinds of cheapest 100Mbit ethernet hardwa= re. > > > > > > > > But I have never ever exceeded 8-9Mbytes/s between a Windows machin= e > > > > and a FreeBSD box - _never_. Be it Samba, different ftp/http server= s, > > > > different FreeBSD versions (4.x/5.x), with ipfw enabled or disabled= , > > > > etc., - the speed always hovers around 7-8Mb/s. I know it's not > > > > critical, I know I should've upgraded to Gigabit hardware long ago, > > > > but is there something wrong? > > > > > > > > I tried different linux distros, but they all seem to be even slowe= r. > > > > Wazzup?.. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew P. > > > > > > Here is the "ifconfig" output from a machine that has one nic set at > > > 10Mbit/half duplex and one at 100Mbit full duplex. how does it compar= e > > > with your system? > > > > > > xl0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > options=3D1<RXCSUM> > > > inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe70:4fb0%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > > > inet 71.102.0.97 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 71.102.0.255 > > > ether 00:10:4b:70:4f:b0 > > > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) > > > status: active > > > xl1: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > > options=3D1<RXCSUM> > > > inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > > > inet6 fe80::210:4bff:fe0a:7cbc%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > > > ether 00:10:4b:0a:7c:bc > > > media: Ethernet 100baseTX <full-duplex> > > > status: active > > > > Well, if that really matters to you: > > (freebsd 5.4) > > vr0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > inet6 fe80::20f:3dff:feca:c494%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > > inet 192.168.17.217 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 > > ether 00:0f:3d:ca:c4:94 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > > status: active > > rl0: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > options=3D8<VLAN_MTU> > > inet 192.168.17.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.17.255 > > ether 00:40:f4:8d:a7:f8 > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > > status: active >=20 > Same netmask for two different segments of the same class C network? How'= s it > work with one segment disconnected? >=20 > -Mike >=20 >=20 > > rl1: flags=3D8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > > options=3D8<VLAN_MTU> > > ether 00:40:f4:8d:9c:af > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > > status: active > > (fedora core 4) > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:2F:04:3E > > inet addr:193.233.5.13 Bcast:193.233.5.63 Mask:255.255.255.= 192 > > inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:81ff:fe2f:43e/64 Scope:Link > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > > RX packets:123946466 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > > TX packets:176380358 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > > RX bytes:42267471987 (39.3 GiB) TX bytes:197116022761 (183.5 > > GiB) Interrupt:177 > > > > Andrew P. >=20 Actually vr0 and rl0 are on different boxes :) Andrew P.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb520642050727023248e54189>