Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:57:07 -0700 From: Evren Yurtesen <yurtesen@ispro.net.tr> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: panic: sorele Message-ID: <41594383.503@ispro.net.tr> In-Reply-To: <200409271628.02524.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040924134957.82478H-100000@fledge.watson.org> <4158BFAC.7050601@ispro.net.tr> <200409271628.02524.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 27 September 2004 09:34 pm, Evren Yurtesen wrote: > >>Robert Watson wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Evren Yurtesen wrote: >>> >>>>Does anybody know what is panic: sorele? :) >>> >>>It's the result of an inconsistency detected by the kernel regarding >>>kernel invariants for sockets. The somewhat uninformative nature of the >>>message is historical, and should probably be fixed. If this is >>>reproduceable, could you rebuild your kernel with INVARIANTS support, as >>>well as DDB so you can generate a stack trace and other debugging >>>information (or, if you have a core, could you use gdb to extract >>>debugging information per the Handbook?) >> >>I am not able to compile the kernel with DDB and INVARIANTS either... >>When I put these options to kernel conf, I get this error >> >>Options Added: >> >>options INVARIANTS >>options KDB >>options DDB > > > INVARIANTS requires the option 'INVARIANT_SUPPORT'. > Good point, one sometimes wonders why options INVARIANTS doesnt automatically include options INVARIANT_SUPPORT :) Another thing is that there is so little information about what is needed in handbook(at least I couldnt find) and not even in sample config files so... But thanks, now it seems like compiling... I will just try to get a dump of the kernel when it crash Evren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41594383.503>