Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 15:38:45 -0400 From: Garance Drosehn <drosihn@gmail.com> To: Thomas Moestl <t.moestl@tu-bs.de> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: sparc64 kernel code question.. Message-ID: <97880ae040520123841ba954e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20040520122411.GA795@timesink.dyndns.org> References: <20040510010301.GA6829@timesink.dyndns.org> <20040520122411.GA795@timesink.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 May 2004 14:24:11 +0200, Thomas Moestl <t.moestl@tu-bs.de> wrote: > > On Tue, 2004/05/18 at 12:57:34 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > to answer question 2... > > nothing.. in my sources I renamed it to cpu_exit2() > > The name probably derives from the fact that it needs to be called > after the sched lock is obtained, as was mentioned in the commit > message. Maybe call it: cpu_exit_postsched() :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?97880ae040520123841ba954e>