Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:42:42 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: maintainer for upcoming linux-fc6 ports Message-ID: <20070325214242.1c73c846@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <68908509@bsam.ru> References: <77867496@bsam.ru> <20070324231332.wnz1k6xjkckk4wss@webmail.leidinger.net> <68908509@bsam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (Sun, 25 Mar 2007 03:25:54 +0400): > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:13:32 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> (from Sat, 24 Mar 2007 18:25:43 +0300): > > > > I'd like to public my intention according upcoming linux-fc6 > > > ports. All new ports initially will have /me as a maintainer. > > > When linux_base-fc6 (note: not when compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 > > > becomes the default at -CURRENT) becomes the default linux port those > > > infrostructure linux ports maintained by emulation@ ATM will get the > > > list name as a maintainer. > > > This is hard to parse, but I think I got your intention. > > I know that in the past there have been some difficulties when linux > base and infrostructure ports were maintained by one person. And I > don't have an intention to grab the ports. > > To rephrase what I ment: > - initial commit -- my maintainership; Ok. > - compat.linux.osrelease becomes default at -CURRENT -- no changes; I'm not sure this part is a good idea, but this can be reevaluated when the change in current happens. > - linux_base-fc6 becomes default -- emulation@ maintainership for > those fc4-infrostructure ports which are maintained by emulation@ > ATM. > > > > Is it a right thing to do? Any recommendations? > > > I don't object, but why? If you go this way, add a comment near the > > Well, there will be a dozen audio ports. Should they all be assigned > to emulation@? If Linux Emulation Team says "It's The Rignt Thing To > Do" I'll be glad to do so. ;-) As the Linux Emulation Team is mainly you and me (at least regarding the ports related stuff), it boils down to what I think of it... and I don't mind either way ATM. > Just for now, I don't know if it's good to say "Hey, pals, I've got > some (two-three dozens of) new ports you should look after". As I may be playing with them for the linuxulator changes anyway... I also think you will be quick as usual to look after problems in case they arrive. It's up to you. Bye, Alexander. -- The ATM board has run out of 10 pound notes. We are having a whip round to refill it, care to contribute ? http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070325214242.1c73c846>