Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:01:40 -0500 From: mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Illumos ZFS, and OpenZFS Message-ID: <db7fb494-1bcf-4732-a82a-ce9ea5d760f5@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <4ff00fb1-6f7b-476e-8eb5-7d5db8262a23@holgerdanske.com> References: <4ff00fb1-6f7b-476e-8eb5-7d5db8262a23@holgerdanske.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/18/2024 10:10 PM, David Christensen wrote: > > Now another OpenZFS bug has been found: > > https://www.phoronix.com/news/OpenZFS-Encrypt-Corrupt > > > My avoidance of OpenZFS has been reaffirmed. I do not want my data on > OpenZFS. > TBH, you are overthinking this. Yes, there are bugs. There are also still bugs in UFS being fixed after all these years. ZFS on FreeBSD both in 12 and 13 have a better than excellent track record. Nothing beats zfs snapshot management ease. UFS is not in the same league here. Nor is bit rot protection via zfs scrub. You said you are moving from RELENG_12 which does not have any zfs encryption so dont worry about edge case zfs encryption bugs in OpenZFS if you dont use that feature in the first place. If you want to stick with FreeBSD, move to RELENG_13. If you feel OpenZFS doesnt work for you, switch to maybe Open Indiana, but I doubt there is as much development going on there. ---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?db7fb494-1bcf-4732-a82a-ce9ea5d760f5>