Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 13:28:01 +0100 From: Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> To: Matteo Riondato <matteo@freebsd.org> Cc: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, current@freebsd.org, pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: should FreeBSD-dhclient depend on FreeBSD-resolvconf? Message-ID: <aO-TUeDnFPOS6Pds@amaryllis.le-fay.org> In-Reply-To: <43B68BB6-02FA-470E-A8C5-99D15E3707D7@FreeBSD.org> References: <324231230.147694.1760527890049@localhost> <aO-QglIdge2VetmF@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <43B68BB6-02FA-470E-A8C5-99D15E3707D7@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Matteo Riondato wrote in <43B68BB6-02FA-470E-A8C5-99D15E3707D7@FreeBSD.org>: > > On Oct 15, 2025, at 8:16 AM, Lexi Winter <ivy@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > NB, "set-minimal-jail" is not intended to be the smallest possible set > > of packages for a jail; it's meant to be "minimal" (the basic base system) > > for jails. so if dhclient use in jails is widespread, we should probably > > add it to minimal-jail. > So does “minimal” really mean “typical”? no. the project has no opinion on what a "typical jail" might contain. "minimal" is the minimal supported configuration for a multi-user UNIX system, i.e. the packages that people need to install to bring up a standard FreeBSD system and have things work as expected. "minimal-jail" is "minimal" without software that doesn't work in jails. dhclient obviously works in jails, but i ommitted it since i thought it was extremely uncommon to use dhclient in a jail. but if this is more common than i thought, we can add it. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCaO+TUQAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YEzaAP97Z8xdXU5E+HaRCgDZwXXQYMBfLgLshxsDyoSPNgnWeQD9G8PSh8iQGWHD KnNVR0qgMWWN7q0EwBCeQ93qzSx/JAI= =t5Cd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aO-TUeDnFPOS6Pds>