Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:20:56 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 machdep.c Message-ID: <20031204162032.Q24814@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20031204213558.GB52636@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20031204.111430.78763615.imp@bsdimp.com> <XFMail.20031204144302.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20031204213558.GB52636@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:09:04PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > > One way would be to make acpi a newbus (which is what I believe Warner > > is thinking of) attachment... Then madt would become a device off the > > acpi bus... > > I think it's time people read the ACPI specification and try to > understand how things are supposed to work, including on non-i386 > platforms. I don't think I've heard of anything more silly than > having a table (disguised as a device) attach to a bus (which is > what ACPI disguises as). Yes, acpi is already a bus. See devinfo with acpi loaded. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031204162032.Q24814>