Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:16:10 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Cc: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> Subject: Re: CVS filling /tmp (was Re: FreeBSD CVS Question (answered!)) Message-ID: <20040114111610.GM39353@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20040114120728.V13656@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20040112132544.D54803@pooker.samsco.home> <20040113225632.GA80120@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <200401140029.27160.max@love2party.net> <20040114004632.GB80120@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <p0602046fbc2a4a50e4dd@[128.113.24.47]> <20040114065541.GE39353@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20040114114446.53b301e4@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040114105209.GL39353@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20040114120728.V13656@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:09:32PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > SH>On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:44:46AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > SH>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:55:41 +0100 > SH>> Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> wrote: > SH>> > SH>> [cvs over rsh/ssh] > SH>> > I have seen this too, and sometimes this has prevented me from checking > SH>> > out RELENG_4 or some such from a machine with a swap backed /tmp. Is > SH>> > there *any* workaround other than using cvsup? Is there a logical > SH>> > explanation for this or is it just an unfixed bug in CVS? > SH>> > SH>> Use NFS to mount the repository on the machine you want to checkout on. > SH> > SH>Yes, that was what I did eventually. I was hoping that I was just missing > SH>something, but obviously I'm not. Thanks for the pointer though. > > I missed the start of this thread, but re-directing the remote CVS temp > directory would probably help: > > CVS_SERVER="cvs -T /var/tmp" cvs .... > > This helps also with remote read-only repository because cvs does not push > the -R flag to the remote CVS: > > CVS_SERVER="cvs -R" cvs ... Hey, great! That was another annoyance that I didn't figure out. Thanks! --Stijn -- "Coca-Cola is solely responsible for ensuring that people - too stupid to know not to tip half-ton machines on themselves - are safe. Forget parenting - the blame is entirely on the corporation for designing machines that look so innocent and yet are so deadly." -- http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/10/28/212418/42 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABST6Y3r/tLQmfWcRAgahAKCozSdIuUyJKUnKizPKkI00OHjAiACfbYG6 2FoWHGZmwxLcjveWk02fLR4= =e126 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040114111610.GM39353>