Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:51:15 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx <geert.hendrickx@ua.ac.be> To: Charles Ulrich <charles@idealso.com> Cc: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> Subject: Re: What is Stable Message-ID: <20040831185115.GA87826@lori.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <33774.24.11.146.21.1093267726.squirrel@freedombi.com> References: <20040823045620.GG15251@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <E1BzAeh-000AxP-2T@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> <33774.24.11.146.21.1093267726.squirrel@freedombi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 09:28:46AM -0400, Charles Ulrich wrote: > Pete French said: > >> still considered stable. After the 5.3 release it is expected > >> 5.X will become stable. At that point I'm not sure what to call > > > > Is that the point at which this list becomes the correct place to ask > > questions about 5.X on as opposed to current ? > > One way to know without keeping track of the details of release engineering is > to just bear in mind that the day on which the first 5.x-STABLE release is > announced on the freebsd.org webpage is also the day that this list becomes > appropriate for 5.x questions. I figure that's a pretty safe indicator. Then where should questions about 4.x go? I'm not upgrading yet, and may not be for a while (at least not for all machines). GH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040831185115.GA87826>