Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:10:21 +0930 From: "O'Connor, Daniel" <darius@dons.net.au> To: Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12 Xorg vs X11SSH-F / AST Message-ID: <2B354C0E-8F94-412B-B6B5-DCF681DAE5C8@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: <2EB91070-54F2-4046-BB5A-86FBE41FFBE1@dons.net.au> References: <2EDB82D8-9EC5-4988-AD1C-21305E712E46@dons.net.au> <4dbdbf1e-b823-20e4-8516-55bb9fdfab88@nomadlogic.org> <7AC86383-2C8E-427D-88BD-48B91FE9ECBC@dons.net.au> <2EB91070-54F2-4046-BB5A-86FBE41FFBE1@dons.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 27 Aug 2019, at 13:45, O'Connor, Daniel <darius@dons.net.au> wrote: >=20 > Although I could set uncacheable (no difference). >=20 > Next stop will be obscure BIOS settings I suppose. I couldn't find anything useful there. I realised that my scfb failure was because I am booting BIOS rather = than UEFI but I will have to reinstall before I can fix that. There was a thread about a performance regression in Linux = (https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=3D2399941) but that applies = to KMS.. I checked the drm-kmod port but there is no ASPEED driver = there. -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2B354C0E-8F94-412B-B6B5-DCF681DAE5C8>