Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:06:17 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: GEOM architecture and the (lack of) need for foot-shooting Message-ID: <20050407230616.GA97588@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <21342.1112914675@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <440f480855b36bcc43281835e1e3781d@xcllnt.net> <21342.1112914675@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 12:57:55AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Which view do you offer the user if he enters the partitioning tool > a second time before he reboots ? > > The in-memory or the on-disk ? It must depends on the tool option. Each tool must have an option, which partition table it plan to modify. I.e. in-core or on-disk. > What about crash-safety ? You can do all crash-safety related to in-core partition because it have immediate effect to mounting etc. You should do no crash-safety related to on-disk partition. Beeing root is crash-safety enough for that. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050407230616.GA97588>