Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 09:00:45 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> Cc: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>, Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no>, FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Building FreeBSD 11.0-stable on FreeBSD 10.1-stable fails Message-ID: <CANCZdfoLezwei=t_MDuVFMrdmzZ_UUKfkJwstW-dBaE0GrAgnQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84890108-CB52-4B2B-B795-C650879469E9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20161016122041.e20ae504c58d4f9224eec6bf@getmail.no> <426D0291-D785-4CFE-A15D-9BE688499ACB@FreeBSD.org> <CANCZdfr1YhbbcVbHfkMqjofHe16zHhcz%2Bi39_MvbiCm84Sje6A@mail.gmail.com> <84890108-CB52-4B2B-B795-C650879469E9@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 16 Oct 2016, at 17:22, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> On 16 Oct 2016, at 12:20, Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no> wrote: >>>> I am trying to build FreeBSD 11.0-stable on a machine which runs: >>>> tingo@kg-v7$ uname -a >>>> FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r278322: Fri Feb 6 21:36:01 CET 2015 >>>> root@kg-v7.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >>>> >>>> I have emptied /usr/src and /usr/obj and fetched the latest stable/11 via subversion: >>>> tingo@kg-v7$ egrep "^BRANCH|^REVISION" /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh >>>> REVISION="11.0" >>>> BRANCH="STABLE" >>>> >>>> But building it (per the procedure in the handbook) fails at the buildworld stage. Both 'make -j5 buildworld' and 'make buildworld' fails, like this: >>>> >>>> c++: error: unable to execute command: Segmentation fault (core dumped) > ... >>> Please make sure your stable/10 is at least r286033. >> >> What's the issue this fixes? > > It fixes a possible crash in clang 3.4, which can occur if newer > versions of llvm are compiled. Unfortunately this fix only went in > after 10.3-RELEASE. I think you're confused. In prepping a patch, it looks like it went in after 9.3-RELEASE on stable/9, but it went in between 10.2 and 10.3 on stable/10. So 10.1R and 10.2R are busted, but 10.3R should work. I've updated UPDATING to reflect this. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfoLezwei=t_MDuVFMrdmzZ_UUKfkJwstW-dBaE0GrAgnQ>