Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:12:42 +1100
From:      Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net>
To:        "Zbigniew Szalbot" <zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: self-signed certificates in outlook
Message-ID:  <20070228111242.4f5fee0b@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <2598.192.168.11.11.1172570647.squirrel@lists.lc-words.com>
References:  <2598.192.168.11.11.1172570647.squirrel@lists.lc-words.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:04:07 +0100 (CET)
"Zbigniew Szalbot" <zbyszek@szalbot.homedns.org> wrote:

> Following a recent discussion I have a question whether there is a way for
> outlook not to complain when it comes to using self-signed certificates?

Have you tried importing the  CA's cert into IE/windows' list of known
and accepted authorities? 

_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome

If it's there, and you can see it, it's real.
If it's not there, and you can see it, it's virtual.
If it's there, and you can't see it, it's transparent.
If it's not there, and you can't see it, you erased it.

I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070228111242.4f5fee0b>