Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 23:35:42 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: g++ shared library segfaults Message-ID: <199705100635.XAA01088@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 10 May 1997 06:33:49 %2B0200." <19970510063349.ZO50925@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You are right thats not illegal . Care to try out doc to find out
whats wrong ? 8)
Hint:
{
<no previous definition of i>
for (long i = 0....) { // first definition of "i"
}
<Any reference to "i" from this point on is outside the scope of the
definition i.>
<for instance the following reference to "i" is illegal>
var.ref(i)
}
Regards,
Amancio
>From The Desk Of J Wunsch :
> As Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> > I traced it further more and it looks like a bug in Docviewer.c using
> > an illegal reference to a local variable.
> >
> > for (long i = 0; i < count; ++i) {
> > ViewerColorInfo& info = _color_info->item_ref(i);
> > if (strcmp(info._name, name) == 0) {
> > break;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > later on it checks the value of i.
>
> That's not illegal. The scope of i is inside the current block (at
> the same level where the stuff is you've been quoting), from the line
> with the `for' loop, to the end of that block.
>
> --
> cheers, J"org
>
> joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
> Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705100635.XAA01088>