Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 20:02:55 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: Darcy Buskermolen <darcy@wavefire.com> Subject: Re: ng_nat revisited Message-ID: <420766FF.714B372D@kuzbass.ru> References: <200501250834.11393.darcy@wavefire.com> <20050207124637.GE91619@cell.sick.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> D> It's been a while since the subject of ng_nat appeared on-list, I'm wondering > D> if there has been anymore work done on this? > > Now I'm trying to work on this. I don't guarantee any success in recent future. > > The first step is porting libalias to be a kernel module. I have already > patches to make it compilable as kernel module, however with some features > disabled - alias monitoring, sockets, and ipfw punching. The first two can > be abandoned, but ipfw punching needs to be reimplemented in kernel. Why do you think alias monitoring may be abadoned? Eugene Grosbein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?420766FF.714B372D>