Date: 16 Jan 2001 13:31:21 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <lowell@world.std.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.2-STABLE = 4.2-RELEASE? Message-ID: <448zob5oxy.fsf@lowellg.ne.mediaone.net> In-Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com's message of "16 Jan 2001 13:35:27 %2B0100" References: <NEBBJIOLADOAPDNOPMGGIEBFCCAA.danny@vkpc.com> <3A643FF4.1B3CEAB2@urx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
kstewart@urx.com (Kent Stewart) writes: > Danny Yoo wrote: > > > > I wasn't able to get into the ports collection on my 4.2-STABLE box through > > sysinstall until I changed one of the options to 4.2-RELEASE. Is there a > > difference? I upgraded recently (a few days ago) from 4.1. Which is more > > recent, STABLE or RELEASE? > > Neither, the only real tag for ports is "." or -current. Not quite right. There *are* tags for releases, there just aren't any branches. I don't really understand the original question, though, so I'm not sure if it's relevant. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?448zob5oxy.fsf>