Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:21:06 +0100 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [ports-i386@dosirak.kr.freebsd.org: kaptain-0.72 failed on i386 5] Message-ID: <41B57602.9050106@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <200412070625.03222.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20041205072925.GG72828@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412051226.18976.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200412061803.39398.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200412070625.03222.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 6. December 2004 18:03, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
>
>>On Sunday 05 of December 2004 12:26, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday, 5. December 2004 08:29, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>
>>>>checking for libXext... no
>>>>configure: error: We need a working libXext to proceed. Since configure
>>>>can't find it itself, we stop here assuming that make wouldn't find
>>>>them either.
>>>
>>>I took the liberty of fixing this one too, it borrows a configure check
>>>from KDE but only depends on QT.
>>
>>Thanks again for taking care of USE_KDELIBS_VER cases and for this one.
>>There are a couple more of this type, like games/qgo, cad/qfsm... This is
>>perhaps a naive question but would it be possible to put
>>CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--x-libraries=${X11BASE}/lib
>>--x-includes=${X11BASE}/include under USE_QT_VER section of bsd.kde.mk
>>instead of under USE_KDELIBS_VER?
>
>
> Not good, USE_QT_VER ports aren't guaranteed to use that configure check (or
> even to use a configure script that understands or manages to gracefully
> ignore these parameters).
Aha, thanks for the explanation.
>>Or to even take it further and put it
>>under .if defined(GNU_CONFIGURE) section in bsd.port.mk, perhaps depending
>>on whether WITHOUT_X11 is defined?
>
>
> That might work, but bsd.port.mk is portmgr territory, I can't touch it.
Yes, yes, it was just a question. Though if it would cause trouble under
USE_QT, then it would cause more trouble in bsd.port.mk. But the PR
74536 should be the right hting anyway, so just forget my rambling on
this one :)
>>It seems that would avoid the need to
>>specify it in couple of ports separately.
>
>
> There aren't that many US_QT_VER consumers in the tree which need those extra
> CONFIGURE_ARGS - if you want, I could save you some donkey work, pick them
> out of kris' error reports and commit the fixes myself.
Nah, it's no problem, I already have the patches to be commited/send to
maintainers (adding CONFIGURE_ARGS like in kaptain). I just wanted to
ask first whether you would prefer to do that in bsd.kde.mk.
Just from a quick look at logs from kdebase and gtk-qt-engine, it seems
that those will need xmkmf and therefore imake build dep. I haven't come
to those yet to take a closer look though.
Dejan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41B57602.9050106>