Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:48:51 +0200 From: "Bjoern Koenig" <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: "'Oldach, Helge'" <Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: nullfs in 4.10 Message-ID: <20040622234827.7D47260@hoppel.local> In-Reply-To: <D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94CC24@dehhx005.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Bjoern Koenig wrote: > > > NFS on localhost instead of nullfs is a very > > good solution. Helge Oldach wrote: > Err, no, the overhead is *much* higher than plain nullfs > or unionfs. Local NFS is essentially fiddling file system > access through the networking subsystem. Ok, I think my exclamation was too officious. I didn't want to say that loopback NFS is the solution for all problems concerning nullfs. But it's a very elegant solution for my purposes concerning jails and especially with /usr/ports and some small other things; overhead isn't a serious problem in my case. - Sorry for inconvenience. Bjoern
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622234827.7D47260>