Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:50:37 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> To: <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>, Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>, Antony Mawer <lists@mawer.org>, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, rafan@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help needed to fix contrib/ee crash/exit when receiving SIGWINCH Message-ID: <permail-2009110317503780e26a0b00007fc8-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> In-Reply-To: <Uzn3rwzsWEtTrYaz4Wl3Xnqcm9I@SNwcwk2DeGhgeFqjLEiQrEAOiKg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb am 2009-11-03: > Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 10:32:29PM +0100, Alexander Best wrote: > > ok. the pr stays in patched state. right now the patch is in HEAD, > > 8-STABLE and 8.0-RELEASE. rafan is thinking about mfc'ing the patch > > to > > 6-stable and 7-stable. however if somebody is willing to modify the > > patch so it applies to those branches that'll be great > Patch applies cleanly to the 7-STABLE, moreover, lib_getch.c from it > has the same logics and fifo_push is essentially unmodified in the > areas that are relevant for this flaw. > I had patched 7-STABLE on the test machine, brought ee from 8.x and > verified that unpatched ncurses give immediate exit, while patched > curses give working ee in respect to the SIGWINCH. > I had also mildly tested vi and sysinstall on the patched 7-STABLE > and found no visible regressions. great. so do we need/want the patch in 6.x? alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?permail-2009110317503780e26a0b00007fc8-a_best01>