Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Jul 2003 19:43:19 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/release/i386 drivers.conf
Message-ID:  <20030726164319.GC41833@sunbay.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030726184513.D5126@gamplex.bde.org>
References:  <200307250010.h6P0AYKW061085@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030725053806.GA36982@sunbay.com> <3F20DF2D.8030209@freebsd.org> <20030725082357.GA53826@sunbay.com> <20030726184513.D5126@gamplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 06:54:48PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>=20
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:41:33AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> > > Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > >Which reminds me.  The floppy wasn't overflowing when building
> > > >5.x snapshot on 4.x, due to the differences in file system
> > > >layout between 4.x and 5.x.  Please see the attached if you're
> > > >interested.
> > > ...
> > > Now that -O2 is the default for newfs in 5-current, does the 'Oflag =
=3D=3D
> > > 2' trick still work?
> > >
> > Yes it does:
> >
> > 1.  doFS.sh creates file systems with -O1
> > 2.  The patch affects the -O1 case:
> >
> > > Even if it does, it feels like a hack to me.  I'd
> > > rather that newfs have an option to directly override the number of
> > > c/g's, rather than rely on indirect calculations and magic constants.
> > >
> > *Shrug*, an option to override a minimum value?
> >
> > > Please don't commit this until we have discussed it more.
>=20
> I think the 'Oflag =3D=3D 2' trick is a hack to avoid touching the -O2 ca=
se,
> since the -O2 implementors haven't responded and others don't have enough
> experience with -O2 to know what is right.  OTOH, with -O1 it is well
> known that you can't have too few cylinder groups except possibly for
> unuseful disk sizes like 40MB, so removing the limit just fixes a bug.
> Anyway, there was no limit in until recently, so we have lots of practical
> experience with using 1 cylinder group.
>=20
Yes, this is exactly the case.  Kirk never responded, and I was
not sure about the -O2 case.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software Ltd,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer

--yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE/Iq+nUkv4P6juNwoRAkPoAJ9+dxcnryGZC2/+roWOHblxU07UngCghe6i
QfU5ZK9DcSanCtf2hJmmR60=
=ggzf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030726164319.GC41833>