Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 12:52:52 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com> To: Kim Culhan <kimc@w8hd.org> Cc: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sup is broken? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960203125010.18437C-100000@haven.uniserve.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960203144006.304I-100000@moonpie.w8hd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 3 Feb 1996, Kim Culhan wrote: > On Sat, 3 Feb 1996, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > > >On Sat, 3 Feb 1996, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > > > > >> >I have been trying for many hours to sup -stable and am becoming > > >> >convinced it is not possible. > > > > > >> I would recommend that EVERYONE interested in -stable use ctm rather > > >>than sup. > > > > > >Where are the instructions located on how to setup ctm? > > > > If the sup server isn't going to work anymore, why don't you remove all > references to it including the FAQ etc ? I think Richard is being overly dramtic. sup is still pretty good way of getting updates, and still being supported. > It used to work fine, now it doesn't. I guess this is just a load factor.. There is also sup2.freebsd.org > If it is a matter of load, who is able to use it to generate that load > and why can't I operate in that mode? Run "sup" in an infinite loop for a few days. Eventually, you will get a slot. (This is a bad thing, BTW) > > regards > kim > > -- > kimc@w8hd.org > Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960203125010.18437C-100000>