Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 08:41:31 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, bmah@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_bridge.c if_ethersubr.c src/sys/netinet6 in6_ifattach.c nd6.c nd6_nbr.c Message-ID: <1126107691.2239.3.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200509062111.j86LBxZa058494@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200509062111.j86LBxZa058494@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] If memory serves me right, Andrew Thompson wrote: > thompsa 2005-09-06 21:11:59 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/net if_bridge.c if_ethersubr.c > sys/netinet6 in6_ifattach.c nd6.c nd6_nbr.c > Log: > Add support for multicast to the bridge and allow inet6 addresses to be > assigned to the interface. > > IPv6 auto-configuration is disabled. An IPv6 link-local address has a > link-local scope within one link, the spec is unclear for the bridge case and > it may cause scope violation. > > An address can be assigned in the usual way; > ifconfig bridge0 inet6 xxxx:... > > Tested by: bmah > Reviewed by: ume (netinet6) > Approved by: mlaier (mentor) > MFC after: 1 week Many thanks! Bruce. PS. Minor clarification on the commit message: Technically one *could* assign an IPv6 address to an if_bridge(4) interface before this change, it just didn't do the right thing. :-) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDHwor2MoxcVugUsMRAok1AKDeorRUBR2AxghbTkS8Zg+m4ehxwgCfe2hv gOuQJOW+B29L1IpvOvT9IOI= =NJwL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1126107691.2239.3.camel>