Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:55:25 +0100 From: "N.J. Mann" <njm@njm.f2s.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x (was: e: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon) Message-ID: <20061012155525.GA28822@ariel.njm.f2s.com> In-Reply-To: <20061012141930.41607.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061012152206.cttnwklqb4s00s8g@webmail.leidinger.net> <20061012141930.41607.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu 12 Oct 07:19, Danial Thom wrote:
>
[...]
> Maybe its just time for the entire FreeBSD team
> to come out of its world of delusion and come to
> terms with what every real-life user of FreeBSD
> knows: In how ever many years of development,
> there is still no good reason to use anything
> other than FreeBSD 4.x except that 4.x doesn't
> support a lot of newer harder.
I am a _real-life_ user of FreeBSD and I am *very* happy with FreeBSD
6.2-PRERELEASE and before that 6.1-STABLE. This particular machine is
quite old - it's a 350MHz K6 - and I from a subjective point of view,
FreeBSD 6.1 has been the fastest OS which has run on it.
YMMV of course.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
"We're predicting third stage shutdown at 11 minutes 42 seconds."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061012155525.GA28822>