Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Nov 2014 09:39:58 +0800
From:      Kevin Lo <kevlo@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Miguel Clara <miguelmclara@gmail.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: "run" card (RT3071) very slow connection
Message-ID:  <20141128013958.GA13959@ns.kevlo.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADGo8CX%2BX3m25YshR_fpY4Zq3MsK4rXFjMA0zeb5vD-=poC_%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CADGo8CX%2BX3m25YshR_fpY4Zq3MsK4rXFjMA0zeb5vD-=poC_%2Bg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:08:15PM +0000, Miguel Clara wrote:
> 
> I've mailing the list before about and issue with 5Ghtz which I then found
> was actually the fact that 11n is not supported on USB cards!
> 
> Still I have a 100/10 fibre connection, and I've been testing some FreeBSD
> 11-current stuff on the laptop with this card (the on-board card is not
> supported by freebsd)
> 
> I'm very close to the router and can't get a better connection than 7-8M
> download and on local speeds its not better than that (tested with iperf).
> 
> The on-board card is a Broadcom 4333 and I got better performance with this
> one (using ndis) but it crashes a lot so its not really a better option.
> 
> To be clear the card is connected to the 2.4Ghtz network which accepts
> N/G/B, I have the 5Ghtz set to N only as this is currently the only device
> at home using 2.4Ghtz.
> 
> I don't expect getting the full 54M limit but this is really poor!
> 
> What info can I post to better investigate?

We answered your question, no?
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless/2014-August/004912.html

> 
> Melhores Cumprimentos // Best Regards
> -----------------------------------------------
> *Miguel Clara*

	Kevin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141128013958.GA13959>