Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Apr 2021 15:18:05 +0200
From:      Juraj Lutter <otis@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:        Chris Roose <chrisroose@fastmail.com>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: NFS issues since upgrading to 13-RELEASE
Message-ID:  <CB6997AE-F6B5-453C-B348-05191305267F@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <YQXPR0101MB09685508380CC691A95898BDDD439@YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References:  <CABW2x9ooC0w4_50Rd3XfLQdKXrUtJEty6mbYmyMSAk7%2BWyyDpA@mail.gmail.com> <089ce08a-1c77-b7a5-4e20-b1c22df23176@fastmail.com> <YQXPR0101MB09685508380CC691A95898BDDD439@YQXPR0101MB0968.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On 25 Apr 2021, at 15:06, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>=20
> 2 - TSO does work correctly, but results in different timing of the =
TCP
>      segments transmitted for the segment compared with non-TSO.
>=20
> I believe that, for otis@, disabling TSO reduced the frequency of =
Linux
> client hangs, but did not stop them.
> --> reverting the patch in r367492 (this patch is not in FreeBSD12) =
has
>       fixed the problem for him.
>=20

Correct. Reverting the patch in r367492 has made the system stable and =
usable (thanks, Rick!).
We also have disabled LRO and TSO on the interfaces serving the NFS =
traffic, it also might have added up to the stability.

There is some more work going on in Phabricator (D29690) that we also =
want to test.


otis

=E2=80=94
Juraj Lutter
otis@FreeBSD.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CB6997AE-F6B5-453C-B348-05191305267F>