Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 02:41:35 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit time_t on sparc64, epilogue(?) Message-ID: <p0600201abbdcda436387@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <200311152232.07935.wes@softweyr.com> References: <p06002011bbdb6f7e5cc8@[128.113.24.47]> <3FB5C942.1010907@freebsd.org> <p06002013bbdb7ea2e91d@[128.113.24.47]> <200311152232.07935.wes@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:32 PM -0800 11/15/03, Wes Peters wrote:
>
>... and pushed back the -STABLE timeline to 5.3. So you've
>been given a reprieve. And just think of all that testing
>time you'll have over the holidays to make sure it's really
>really right. ;^)
Okay, I'll get right on it! :-)
(well, maybe not until next weekend...)
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0600201abbdcda436387>