Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:29:56 +0400
From:      Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/awk main.c.diff
Message-ID:  <20060920042956.GA34474@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20060919200652.GC23360@rambler-co.ru>
References:  <200609151328.k8FDSAGM094520@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060919194959.GA3692@dragon.NUXI.org> <20060919200652.GC23360@rambler-co.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:06:52AM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it will be accepted by Brian since another option
> already allowed its argument to be specified without a preceding
> space, 

I don't think so. My experience shows that he does not accept fixes 
easily, f.e. our locale POSIX and GNU awk compatible fixes many people 
send to him several times already. I can't tell for sure about this change 
exactly, but...

> and I don't share your argument of "this is BWK awk".  I
> think it's more important to be POSIX-compliant than BWK-compliant,
> even if it means to change vendor code.  Of a particular interest
> is item 2.c of POSIX's Utility Argument Syntax.

I fully agree with that. POSIX compatibility is our primary goal here. We 
don't need Another One non-POSIX Private Awk clone by the price of be 
GNU-free here.

BTW, I was among few who dislike GAWK replacement with BAWK, because of 
poor BAWK POSIX compatibility. Initially it was in even more poor state 
than now, it is a long story how our fixes was accepted in the one release 
and then rejected in the following one afterwards and so on.

IMHO I still think that GAWK is more actively developed (I mean betas, not 
2002 release, FSF releases are very obsoleted as usual) and have good a 
chances to become truly multibyte, but we already made our choice long 
time ago(

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iQCVAwUBRRDDxOJgpPLZnQjrAQKEZgQAmL4Nwdv3kX6Ir643y0AvOhPeZjOHDCnt
Y2t5h9W9Af2o1WZzblbh/TOlLM0aXDwwE6eb3RrMUKQlOALAcy/Iylz3AdQi4sqH
1eyXSVASNEHWrt3CPDDk+ZyzDM5DOG6jHGjqMUqKldlRD30EErdXUrFOJp5zddV4
TruMWBnrgy8=
=O9/W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060920042956.GA34474>