Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:34:03 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r305066 - head/tools/tools/crypto Message-ID: <9289003.aPpUzvfJdT@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <201608301428.u7UESZKQ005906@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201608301428.u7UESZKQ005906@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 02:28:35 PM George V. Neville-Neil wrote: > Author: gnn > Date: Tue Aug 30 14:28:35 2016 > New Revision: 305066 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/305066 > > Log: > Update cryptotest for modern algorithms > > Reviewed by: cem > Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications, LLC (Netgate) > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7598 Doesn't removing 'static' result in a bunch of warnings from clang now since you don't have function prototypes? Assuming these functions aren't meant to be exposed as a library to other programs, static is more correct. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9289003.aPpUzvfJdT>