Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:57:26 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <1095160797.20050213085726@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <BE475D84-7D76-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> References: <20050212203851.D694116A4D3@hub.freebsd.org> <1108249638.32574.49.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <863830644.20050213025358@wanadoo.fr> <BE475D84-7D76-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: > Maybe companies who support MS or other proprietary software > can't as they don't have the source. But support companies that > support open source can very easily fix problems -- they have the > source and the license to use it Unfortunately, their fix makes the software non-standard. You need to be able to roll fixes into the official release. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1095160797.20050213085726>